From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 27 09:17:25 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB2B37B401 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 09:17:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from h132-197-179-27.gte.com (h132-197-179-27.gte.com [132.197.179.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91EB143F75 for ; Tue, 27 May 2003 09:17:23 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ak03@gte.com) Received: from kanpc.gte.com (ak03@localhost [127.0.0.1]) h4RGHM3D007125; Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from ak03@kanpc.gte.com) Received: (from ak03@localhost) by kanpc.gte.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h4RGHMIA007124; Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:22 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 12:17:21 -0400 From: Alexander Kabaev To: David Leimbach Message-Id: <20030527121721.315eb88c.ak03@gte.com> In-Reply-To: <6855087.1054050580287.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com> References: <6855087.1054050580287.JavaMail.leimy2k@mac.com> Organization: Verizon Data Services X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.8.11claws156 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd5.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: policy on GPL'd drivers? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:17:25 -0000 On Tue, 27 May 2003 10:49:40 -0500 David Leimbach wrote: > > On Tuesday, May 27, 2003, at 10:40AM, Alexander Kabaev > wrote: > > >On Tue, 27 May 2003 10:32:42 -0500 > >David Leimbach wrote: > > > >> Ugh... the network driver portion of the nforce drivers is *not* > >> GPL'd but it > >> has a linux only and anti-reverse engineeing clause. > >> > >> Dave > > > >Then using the diver on FreeBSD will be a NVidia's license violation, > >wouldn't it? One more reason to keep it out of the tree. > > Just the network driver... the audio driver in the tarball is still > GPL'd. Well, network driver is a special case as it is this weird binary 'kernel' + OS shim combination which is getting popular lately. Have you thought about getting NVidia's permission to link non-GPLed shims with their binary object? A quick scan through NVidia audio driver sources suggests that the device is very similar to Intel ICH2 AC'97-based cards. Should you see is BSD-led ich.c driver can be reused instead of the Linux driver? -- Alexander Kabaev