From owner-freebsd-current Tue Aug 20 14:34:23 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id OAA06125 for current-outgoing; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:34:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from paloalto.access.hp.com (daemon@paloalto.access.hp.com [15.254.56.2]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA06100 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from srmail.sr.hp.com by paloalto.access.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA256266840; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:34:01 -0700 Received: from hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com by srmail.sr.hp.com with ESMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA198136826; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:33:46 -0700 Received: from mina.sr.hp.com by hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com with SMTP (1.37.109.16/15.5+ECS 3.3) id AA000846825; Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:33:45 -0700 Message-Id: <199608202133.AA000846825@hpnmhjw.sr.hp.com> To: current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: ktrace/kdump under 2.2-960801-snap? Date: Tue, 20 Aug 1996 14:33:45 -0700 From: Darryl Okahata Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk [ I looked in the archives, but couldn't find anything. ] Does ktrace/kdump work under the 960801-snap? Ktrace seems to work fine, but kdump dies with a "kdump: bogus length 0xf000ef6f" error. -- Darryl Okahata Internet: darrylo@sr.hp.com DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Hewlett-Packard, or of the little green men that have been following him all day.