From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Jan 16 00:29:06 2012
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::35])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E707010656B1;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:29:06 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from 172-17-198-245.globalsuite.net (hub.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
	by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEC57153925;
	Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:28:22 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <4F136F25.6000402@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2012 16:28:21 -0800
From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Organization: http://SupersetSolutions.com/
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
	rv:9.0) Gecko/20111222 Thunderbird/9.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: miwi@FreeBSD.org
References: <201201141921.q0EJLpcM094082@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<4F135DFF.7050903@FreeBSD.org> <4F13D231.8060703@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <4F13D231.8060703@FreeBSD.org>
X-Enigmail-Version: undefined
OpenPGP: id=1A1ABC84
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/sysutils Makefile ports/sysutils/tzdialog
 Makefile distinfo pkg-descr
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree
	<cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 00:29:07 -0000

On 01/15/2012 23:30, Martin Wilke wrote:
> On Sun Jan 15 23:15:11 2012, Doug Barton wrote:
>> When adding things to ports that duplicate base functionality it is
>> customary to say how they are better than what we already have. :)
>
> As usual Patch are welcome :).

Yeah, that completely doesn't answer my question. You were the one who
committed this port. Can you please explain why?

Thanks,

Doug

-- 

	You can observe a lot just by watching.	-- Yogi Berra

	Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS.
	Yours for the right price.  :)  http://SupersetSolutions.com/