Date: Sat, 2 Dec 2006 13:02:28 +0100 From: Nico -telmich- Schottelius <nico-freebsd-fs@schottelius.org> To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: ACL broken on all FreeBSD variants Message-ID: <20061202120228.GB27796@schottelius.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hey! Just choosed that provocant topic, because there seem to be no reaction on all the reports I send about FreeBSD ACLs. Just wanted to know, whether anyone REALLY uses ACLs with default entries. If so, does it really work with creating new files? All my tests say no, and I testet 5.4, 6.1, 6.2. If someone could confirm that FreeBSD does have ongoing and unfixed ACLs this would help me, so I can stop spending time on tests. Sincerly Nico P.S.:=20 I reported on freebsd-questions problems with Default ACLs on 2006-10-18, <20061018141753.GA12559@schottelius.org>. I reported on freebsd-fs problems with Default ACLs on 2006-11-23, <20061123171444.GG24205@schottelius.org>. --=20 ``...if there's one thing about Linux users, they're do-ers, not whiners.'' (A quotation of Andy Patrizio I completely agree with) --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFFcWtUuL75KpiFGIwRAiI9AJ9XIJgWr9c7lLtBgp0PMOhE+x+ykwCggLZm ZH4DeMmJqhfZc482jKLyGb8= =RYTh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zx4FCpZtqtKETZ7O--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061202120228.GB27796>