Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 08 May 2008 08:28:35 +0400
From:      Alex Tutubalin <lexa@lexa.ru>
To:        "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        Jeremy Messenger <mezz7@cox.net>, cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: ports/graphics/libraw Makefile
Message-ID:  <48228173.50607@lexa.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20080507202217.GI70171@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200805071306.m47D6CwN021711@repoman.freebsd.org> <op.uastc1ps9aq2h7@mezz.mezzweb.com> <20080507202217.GI70171@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Sergey A. Osokin wrote:
>
> I'm also Cc'ed this letter to libraw author Alex Tutubalin.
> Alex, could you provide more information about compile optimization?
> Thank you.
>   
LibRaw depends heavily on Dave Coffin's dcraw utlility. I've copied -O4 
option from dcraw page
(http://cybercom.net/~dcoffin/dcraw/)

Anyway, just tested it on FreeBSD7/i386 on Intel C2D
Execution time for LibRaw test is near same for -O3 and -O4
There is significant difference between -O2 and -O3 (about 10%)

So, you can change to -O3 in port Makefile patches

I will also change to -O3 in future LibRaw releases.

-- 
Alex Tutubalin
Web: http://blog.lexa.ru
mailto:lexa@lexa.ru




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48228173.50607>