From owner-cvs-all Mon Aug 30 1:42:40 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (castles523.castles.com [208.214.165.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873B5152E5; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 01:42:36 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Received: from dingo.cdrom.com (LOCALHOST [127.0.0.1]) by dingo.cdrom.com (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA18568; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 01:36:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mike@dingo.cdrom.com) Message-Id: <199908300836.BAA18568@dingo.cdrom.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Martin Cracauer Cc: Mike Smith , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/bin/mkdir mkdir.1 mkdir.c In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 30 Aug 1999 10:35:24 +0200." <19990830103523.A6689@cons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 01:36:27 -0700 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk > > Like, let's see, cp, mv, rm, etc.? It's even more relevant for > > commands which generate their own datasets through internal processes > > (eg. mv, cp -R, rm -r...) > > I said it makes a little more sense than for mkdir, not that I support > it. Except in combination with -R as I said. Each of the above examples has -R-like behaviour. Adding -v to mkdir only makes sense to me for the sake of orthagonality, which I'd be inclined to say is good enough for this. -- \\ The mind's the standard \\ Mike Smith \\ of the man. \\ msmith@freebsd.org \\ -- Joseph Merrick \\ msmith@cdrom.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message