Date: Fri, 24 Mar 2000 09:10:03 +0900 From: "Daniel C. Sobral" <dcs@newsguy.com> To: Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com> Cc: Michael Lucas <mwlucas@blackhelicopters.org>, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New article Message-ID: <38DAB25B.E2BBC400@newsguy.com> References: <200003231326.IAA24776@blackhelicopters.org> <38DA7A60.B7C23121@newsguy.com> <38DA950C.D4DCE9CC@softweyr.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Wes Peters wrote:
>
> "Daniel C. Sobral" wrote:
> >
> > Legacy hardware will still need to be hand configured (though not
> > necessarily built in the kernel), and some kernel options are probably
> > unavoidable.
>
> But could potentially be configured through a loader script, rather
> than compiled into the kernel.
The legacy stuff, yes. I said so. :-) The kernel options... As I said
*some* as unavoidable. INVARIANTS?
--
Daniel C. Sobral (8-DCS)
dcs@newsguy.com
dcs@freebsd.org
capo@zurichgnomes.bsdconspiracy.net
One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them,
One IP to bring them all and in the zone bind them.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?38DAB25B.E2BBC400>