Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2019 19:57:29 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: toolchain@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 237068] /usr/local/bin/ld: BFD (GNU Binutils) 2.30 assertion fail elflink.c:2824 Message-ID: <bug-237068-29464-btWs2JewKa@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-237068-29464@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D237068 --- Comment #48 from Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com> --- (In reply to Justin Hibbits from comment #47) Dimitry's comment #% indicated that he used printf's. My comment #8 shows using gdb. Just after the backtrace I reported (of course your symbol might be different): QUOTE For _bfd_elf_fix_symbol_flags the later gdb output shows that *h has: _ZZN4llvm7hashing6detail18get_execution_seedEvE4seed@@LLVM_6.0 root.type =3D bfd_link_hash_defweak is_weakalias =3D 1 *h->u.alias has: __bss_start@@LLVM_6.0 root.type =3D bfd_link_hash_indirect is_weakalias =3D 0 END QUOTE The full print *h (with notes about from where in the backtrace) was shown later in the comment. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-237068-29464-btWs2JewKa>