From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 2 13:24:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C9916A412; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:24:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.ntplx.net (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96D8C43D6D; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 13:23:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deischen@freebsd.org) Received: from sea.ntplx.net (sea.ntplx.net [204.213.176.11]) by mail.ntplx.net (8.13.7/8.13.7/NETPLEX) with ESMTP id kA2DN9Bq002592; Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:23:09 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 2 Nov 2006 08:23:09 -0500 (EST) From: Daniel Eischen X-X-Sender: eischen@sea.ntplx.net To: Maxim Sobolev In-Reply-To: <4549A9F2.4070000@FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: References: <454936CA.6060308@FreeBSD.org> <45494692.5090200@FreeBSD.org> <4549A9F2.4070000@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Message whitelisted by DRAC access database, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (mail.ntplx.net [204.213.176.10]); Thu, 02 Nov 2006 08:23:09 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS and Clam AntiVirus (mail.ntplx.net) Cc: "current@freebsd.org" , julian@elischer.org Subject: Re: libpthread shared library version number X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Eischen List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2006 13:24:37 -0000 On Thu, 2 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Daniel Eischen wrote: >> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >> >>> Daniel Eischen wrote: >>>> On Wed, 1 Nov 2006, Maxim Sobolev wrote: >>>> >>>>> Guys, >>>>> >>>>> I have noticed that libpthread shared library version number in 6-STABLE >>>>> and 7-CURRENT is the same (.2), which causes all threaded application >>>>> compiled for 6-STABLE to segfault when executed on 7-CURRENT system, >>>>> unless libpthread.so.2 is replaced with with its 6-STABLE version which >>>>> in turn will create problems with threaded apps compiled for 7-CURRENT. >>>>> IMHO we should increase version number in 7-CURRENT, so that it is in >>>>> the line of what we have for other system libraries. >>>> >>>> It should be done as part of a larger set of library version bumps. >>>> All libraries should be bumped. I believe kan and kensmith were >>>> suppose to be looking at that. We wanted to enable symble versioning >>>> by default, so all libraries would need to be bumped. >>> >>> Well, as I said the rest of the libs have already been bumped between 6.x >>> and 7.x, I don't know if libpthread is exception. Perhaps somebody just >>> missed it out? >> >> When did this happen? Did I miss it? I know we bumped libc. > > OK, you are right, only libc and several others have been bumped so far. But > the point stays - libpthread is not compatible between 7-CURRENT and 6-STABLE > (both forward and backward), so that it should be bumped in -CURRENT ASAP. This isn't a new problem and has existed since libc was bumped. I'd like to see everything bumped at the same time. -- DE