From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 7 16:04:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898B4106566B for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe08.swip.net [212.247.154.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F9F8FC13 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2009 16:04:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=GqLEGs8G9nuRgBIQ54oA:9 a=b-XV6MyxXhr9QMFLehMA:7 a=8eognya5aV4DfNbeaWQ7fUSzn30A:4 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop.adsl.tele2.no) by mailfe08.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.16) with ESMTPA id 1306247669; Wed, 07 Oct 2009 18:04:19 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 7 Oct 2009 18:05:07 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.2.4; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-Face: (%:6u[ldzJ`0qjD7sCkfdMmD*RxpOwEEQ+KWt[{J#x6ow~JO:,zwp.(t; @Aq :4:&nFCgDb8[3oIeTb^'",;u{5{}C9>"PuY\)!=#\u9SSM-nz8+SR~B\!qBv MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200910071805.09153.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: Rui Paulo , Ian FREISLICH Subject: Re: urtw(4) feedback. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:04:23 -0000 On Wednesday 07 October 2009 17:10:58 Ian FREISLICH wrote: > Rui Paulo wrote: > > On 7 Oct 2009, at 13:23, Ian Freislich wrote: > > > urtw0: rtl8187b rf rtl8225z2 hwrev e > > > > > > Opening it up confirms the presence of a RTL8187B. > > > > > > However throughput is very poor, I haven't been able to get more > > > than about 130kB/s and pings seem to be timed every 1.5 seconds. > > > > This might help: > > http://p4db.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=169276 > > Not significantly. The stability of the wireless association is > improved throughput is nearly doubled to 240kB/s, but there's some > wierdness: it responds to ping from "outside" almost immediately, > but when the host pings out, it spaces requests at about 1.6 seconds > (which it doesn't do on the alc0 interface). > > [mini] /usr/src/sys/modules/usb/urtw # time ping -c2 10.0.2.1 > PING 10.0.2.1 (10.0.2.1): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=36.176 ms > 64 bytes from 10.0.2.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=44.282 ms > > --- 10.0.2.1 ping statistics --- > 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 36.176/40.229/44.282/4.053 ms > > real 0m1.696s > user 0m0.000s > sys 0m0.001s > > It also takes about 10 seconds for the wlan0 interface to appear > after insertion. And if you use "ping -f" ? Could it be that it is only the last packet sent that is not flushed out? --HPS