From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 13:32:59 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8BB16A404 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:32:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mail.bsdforen.de (bsdforen.de [212.204.60.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E00913C455 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:32:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kamikaze@bsdforen.de) Received: from mobileKamikaze.norad (nat-wh-1.rz.uni-karlsruhe.de [129.13.72.169]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdforen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 783CA40592F; Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:32:57 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <47BC2C08.4040109@bsdforen.de> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:32:56 +0100 From: Dominic Fandrey User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (X11/20080205) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eygene Ryabinkin References: <47BADE07.9020402@gmx.de> <7CZsNG/ix1SXULta6Bdgf51ZwDE@TqmFlxFMySuiJ36EgnrGRgt6KQ8> <47BB01BE.4010309@gmx.de> <0FD9F726-6E45-4A81-9DE1-E3F0AAF3668B@gothic.net.au> <47BC22EA.4020708@bsdforen.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfs mounts don't work through fstab X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:32:59 -0000 Eygene Ryabinkin wrote: > Dominic, > > Wed, Feb 20, 2008 at 01:54:02PM +0100, Dominic Fandrey wrote: >>> May be some other utility (like mount) had extracted NFS mounts from >>> the /etc/fstab by itself, but >>> 1. it is silly, especially when fstab parsing functions are in libc; >>> 2. I can not find such changes on the transition path 6.2 -> 7. >>> While both of the arguments are not very convincing ;)), it may be >>> well that you missed something about your system. >>> >>> Could you, please, recheck? >> I'm quite certain that I used to not need this. I have checked the history >> of Wiki articles where I documented this. > > OK, what version of the system you had before the problems started > to show? I switched from RELENG_6 to RELENG_7 shortly after RELENG_8 was branched.