From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 15 12:40:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C8916A41F for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA4743D55 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0FCe7PM092125 for ; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0FCe7n4092124; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:07 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:07 GMT Message-Id: <200601151240.k0FCe7n4092124@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Fredrik Lindberg Cc: Subject: Re: ports/91734: New port: security/bioapi X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Fredrik Lindberg List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:40:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/91734; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Fredrik Lindberg To: Sergey Matveychuk Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91734: New port: security/bioapi Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 13:31:49 +0100 Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Fredrik Lindberg wrote: > >>The original source contains ^M, they are intact in the shar archive but >>probably got corrupted by send-pr. >>I've attached a uuencoded version of the shar archive. > > > Tabulations in Makefile looks bad, I'll fix them. > > I have two questions about the port. > 1) Why so strict restriction: >= 6.0 to build? May be a problem may be > fixed with USE_GCC=3.4? I can't get it to compile on FreeBSD < 6.0, even using GCC 3.4.4. The code quality of this library is quite bad so I guess it will require even more patching to fix it. > 2) If it's not official bioapi branch, may be it should be reflected in > port name (with some suffix)? Well, maybe. But this is the de-facto version people are using and it's acctually the official version + alot of bugfixes only. Even companies providing BSP modules (Biometric Service Providers, ie biometric backends) are recommending the use of this version. Hopefully the BioAPI Consortium will release a better 2.0 version soon. > > - -- > Dixi. > Sem. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFDyjOWTclL2LcfYF0RAsnwAJ9zkpojEHw1Hm8uICy1jyj4XeGhdACfVOvJ > NB5ammezyvvLyZdbUA8Izhs= > =m7/v > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----