From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Mar 21 19:37:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A7876F; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tensor.andric.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 911E4F26; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:37:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::8b7:b034:6f55:4291] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:8b7:b034:6f55:4291]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3990C5C4D; Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:37:56 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: What's the official method to test the build now? Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1126F200-5784-4379-9334-82A409A9BF5E"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 20:37:49 +0100 Message-Id: <12C281DE-55EC-4ECF-95BD-DFA6FCAABA26@FreeBSD.org> References: <1426944905.20654.5.camel@freebsd.org> To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2070.6) Cc: FreeBSD Current , Ryan Stone , Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 19:37:59 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_1126F200-5784-4379-9334-82A409A9BF5E Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 21 Mar 2015, at 17:25, Garrett Cooper wrote: >=20 >> On Mar 21, 2015, at 06:35, Ian Lepore wrote: >>=20 >>> On Fri, 2015-03-20 at 19:52 -0400, Ryan Stone wrote: >>> "make tinderbox" has been broken for weeks, so I presume it's not = what I'm >>> supposed to be using to test my commits anymore. What's the = officially >>> supported make target that I'm supposed to use? >>=20 >> I use "make universe", sometimes with the -DMAKE_JUST_KERNELS option. >=20 > make universe doesn't error out; make tinderbox does however. >=20 >> But the LINT kernels for x86 and sparc have been broken since = January. So what's the effective difference between universe and tinderbox then? I've built quite a number of universes recently, and I while I did get a few errors, they were usually fixed quite quickly. Also, universe generates LINT kernel configurations, and builds them. I didn't see errors there either... Does tinderbox generate LINT configs differently, somehow? -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_1126F200-5784-4379-9334-82A409A9BF5E Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27 iEYEARECAAYFAlUNyJIACgkQsF6jCi4glqMxvACgzdWOoH62GQY50L+O0Uc+NmK6 bbMAn3mAm9CD+tbveK1nRTf+IzfNkVS6 =SCPM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_1126F200-5784-4379-9334-82A409A9BF5E--