From owner-freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Sun Feb 21 09:04:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE02FAB082B; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (mail.vlakno.cz [91.217.96.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77FFD1D83; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlakno.cz) Received: by vlakno.cz (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 2F4F01E22C0A; Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:02:15 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 10:02:15 +0100 From: Roman Divacky To: Dimitry Andric Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain , FreeBSD PowerPC ML , Mark Millard Subject: Re: I've submitted 207175 for a clang 3.8.0 va_list handling problem for powerpc [fpr use also tested] Message-ID: <20160221090215.GA21511@vlakno.cz> References: <3A260EC5-E69A-4980-8F74-C04395F4E5F4@dsl-only.net> <20160215201800.GA20796@vlakno.cz> <74577A87-3006-43A9-9EAB-F51D946B6245@dsl-only.net> <28FF474D-2109-4605-8B2B-C5374CBCCF42@dsl-only.net> <8EB46124-3335-4643-8C64-16DA56D481F5@dsl-only.net> <8C40A5D7-C0B8-4142-89D4-228017C446CE@dsl-only.net> <20160220083450.GA55777@vlakno.cz> <68D66F67-EC4D-4CF2-A249-C7F0C4D4747D@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <68D66F67-EC4D-4CF2-A249-C7F0C4D4747D@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 09:04:31 -0000 On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 03:26:58PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 20 Feb 2016, at 09:34, Roman Divacky wrote: > > Fwiw, I've just committed the patch to clang in r261422. You might want > > to keep using a local modification or ask dim@ to import that patch > > to our copy of 3.8. > > I've asked the LLVM release manager to consider merging this into the > 3.8 branch. The fix looks trivial enough. :) > > -Dimitry > Cool :) Mark, so what remains broken now beside the C++ exceptions? Also, can you try to take a look at kernel? Thanks! Roman