From owner-freebsd-arch Sun Feb 25 2:52:17 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch [62.48.0.70]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5C21137B401 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2001 02:52:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from oppermann@monzoon.net) Received: (qmail 34650 invoked from network); 25 Feb 2001 10:49:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO monzoon.net) ([195.134.140.21]) (envelope-sender ) by mailtoaster1.pipeline.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 25 Feb 2001 10:49:07 -0000 Message-ID: <3A98DB77.AE110714@monzoon.net> Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2001 11:16:23 +0100 From: Andre Oppermann X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wes Peters Cc: Jos Backus , arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: DJBDNS vs. BIND References: <200102190547.WAA12829@usr05.primenet.com> <3A90CA94.D7CBCB65@softweyr.com> <20010218233916.J28286@lizzy.bugworks.com> <3A9149CC.7A1FADB8@softweyr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Wes Peters wrote: > > Jos Backus wrote: > > > > [This is rapidly turning into a bikeshed...] > > > > On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 12:25:50AM -0700, Wes Peters wrote: > > > Some of the assumptions behind the operation of djbdns may not hold true > > > for your installation. > > > > Some of those behind BIND's operation may not either. > > > > BIND's instability and problems are costing people and companies all over the > > world real time and money. > > But with BIND, you the user can fix them. You can do that with DJBDNS, too, > but you can't share your fixes with anyone else. You can but you have to distribute them separatly. See qmail-ldap. -- Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message