Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2013 22:06:45 +0100 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: mdf@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-hackers <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: kmem_map auto-sizing and size dependencies Message-ID: <20130121210645.GC1341@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <CAMBSHm-xPo7bH556h4QwtHhCUHX%2B4g_pv3=t29C1SLD4VnBWsQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <50F96A67.9080203@freebsd.org> <CAMBSHm-xPo7bH556h4QwtHhCUHX%2B4g_pv3=t29C1SLD4VnBWsQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 08:26:04AM -0800, mdf@FreeBSD.org wrote: > > Should it be set to a larger initial value based on min(physical,KVM) = space > > available? >=20 > It needs to be smaller than the physical space, [...] Or larger, as the address space can get fragmented and you might not be able to allocate memory even if you have physical pages available. --=20 Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheelsystems.com FreeBSD committer http://www.FreeBSD.org Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! http://tupytaj.pl --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlD9reUACgkQForvXbEpPzRQuACgmpMuaWnlzrwGLDg8via2mpRB H/MAn0osPB9G8vejrumWSQaYnHc8khDu =hBju -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iFRdW5/EC4oqxDHL--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130121210645.GC1341>