From owner-freebsd-current Wed Dec 2 18:14:01 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA10253 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 18:11:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from piglet.dstc.edu.au (piglet.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA10244 for ; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 18:11:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ggm@sleet.dstc.edu.au) Received: from sleet.dstc.edu.au (sleet.dstc.edu.au [130.102.176.45]) by piglet.dstc.edu.au (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA31307 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 12:11:03 +1000 (EST) Received: (from ggm@localhost) by sleet.dstc.edu.au (8.8.5/8.8.4) id MAA13640 for current@freebsd.org; Thu, 3 Dec 1998 12:11:00 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 3 Dec 1998 12:11:00 +1000 (EST) From: George Michaelson Message-Id: <199812030211.MAA13640@sleet.dstc.edu.au> To: current@freebsd.org Subject: can somebody post a succint *why* on Linux emul in ELFland fails? Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've lost the plot. If somebody can post brief bulletpoints on the ELFland issues which make Linux and StarrOffice 5.0 a nogo just now I'd be very appreciative. I'm not after complaining, just want to understand state-of-play. It comes down to /proc and kernel threading ? is there more ? cheers -George To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message