From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jul 23 23:47:46 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7628C16A529 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:47:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hur.st) Received: from spork.qfe3.net (spork.qfe3.net [212.13.207.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 370BC13C4A3 for ; Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:47:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@hur.st) Received: from [81.104.144.87] (helo=voi.aagh.net) by spork.qfe3.net with esmtp (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ID7I3-000A79-9E; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:26:11 +0100 Received: from freaky by voi.aagh.net with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ID7I3-0007c9-4c; Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:26:11 +0100 Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2007 00:26:11 +0100 From: Thomas Hurst To: Chris Dionissopoulos Message-ID: <20070723232611.GA28890@voi.aagh.net> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Dionissopoulos , Jeff Roberson , current@freebsd.org References: <20070721174631.S561@10.0.0.1> <1807103749.20070722111025@freemail.gr> <20070722014208.G561@10.0.0.1> <684796249.20070722134105@freemail.gr> <20070722160935.GA18069@voi.aagh.net> <751338143.20070722232925@freemail.gr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <751338143.20070722232925@freemail.gr> Organization: Not much. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.15 (2007-04-06) Sender: Thomas Hurst X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:59:38 +0000 Cc: Jeff Roberson , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ULE status, invalid load, buildkernel times. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2007 23:47:46 -0000 * Chris Dionissopoulos (dionch@freemail.gr) wrote: > Its an Intel c2d-6300 (see prev. messages) using cpufreq(4). > Everything works fine (for 6 months or more) with 4BSD or > ULE2/3(unpatched) scheduler. > > AFAIK, the problem Jeff trying to resolve is why a ULE3(+last patch) > kernel, produces panics when a process touches cpufreq(4) context. Yes, I don't mean to say the problem lies specifically in acpi_throttle, just that I've seen "it used to work but doesn't any more" as a result of it, and it may be worth trying. The large number and range of frequencies suggests you have it loaded, since as far as I know neither Cool'n'Quiet nor SpeedStep scale that low on their own. -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/