From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Jan 13 06:21:31 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF03316A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.167])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F85343D2D
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Tue, 13 Jan 2004 06:21:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk)
Received: from scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.166] helo=localhost)
	by tx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AgPQ8-000620-HE
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:28 +0000
Received: from rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.165])
 by localhost (scan1.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.166]) (amavisd-new, port 25)
 with ESMTP id 22999-07 for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
 Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:28 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253])
	by rx1.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.20)
	id 1AgPQ8-00061v-3q
	for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:28 +0000
Received: (qmail 17926 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2004 14:20:36 -0000
Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with
	qmail-scanner-1.16  (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53.  Clear:. 
	Processed in 1.72431 secs); 13 Jan 2004 14:20:36 -0000
X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway
X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.72431 secs)
Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk)
	(163.1.161.131)
	by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 13 Jan 2004 14:20:35 -0000
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.1.20040113141847.042fc870@imap.sfu.ca>
X-Sender: cperciva@imap.sfu.ca (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:23 +0000
To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= )
From: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <xzpeku4t0bt.fsf@dwp.des.no>
References: <20040113093903.GA84055@mimoza.pantel.net>
 <1073998390.18384.19.camel@kaiser.sig11.org>
 <20040114001137.5ce8983b@piglet.goo>
 <1074000332.18384.43.camel@kaiser.sig11.org>
 <20040114003443.260c6738@piglet.goo>
 <4003F684.6090907@centtech.com>
 <xzpeku4t0bt.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Status reports - why not regularly?
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2004 14:21:31 -0000

At 14:00 13/01/2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote:
>You must have missed the part of this thread where I said "we tried
>that before, and it didn't work".

   I think we're approaching this issue from the wrong angle.  In your
opinion, what -- if anything -- can be asked of developers which would
contribute to the provision of status reports?

Colin Percival