From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 4 13:59:41 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77AC16A4BF; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:59:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D1F43FE5; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:59:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h84KxTTI002401; Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:59:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Julian Elischer From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 04 Sep 2003 13:39:43 PDT." Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 22:59:29 +0200 Message-ID: <2400.1062709169@critter.freebsd.dk> cc: arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DISCUSSION: /dev/fd%d.%d and /dev/{a}cd%d[ac] to be discontinued ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2003 20:59:41 -0000 In message , Ju lian Elischer writes: >I certainly agree about the 'a' and 'c' devices. > >I'm not so sure that the density devices should go. > > [...] > >An ioctl to select the right member of fd_types[] >should not be difficult fopr setting a default value.. Man fdcontrol(8) ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.