Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 6 Feb 2012 12:34:06 +0100
From:      Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>
To:        Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r230984 - head/sys/kern
Message-ID:  <CAF-QHFXQXqFskmMU%2BYxqmFEVKOoiHGMdnHBkSjqaEVZmjs_ovQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <201202041649.q14GnUnI043572@svn.freebsd.org>
References:  <201202041649.q14GnUnI043572@svn.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4 February 2012 17:49, Ryan Stone <rstone@freebsd.org> wrote:
> Author: rstone
> Date: Sat Feb =C2=A04 16:49:29 2012
> New Revision: 230984
> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/230984
>
> Log:
> =C2=A0Whenever a new kernel thread is spawned, explicitly clear any CPU a=
ffinity
> =C2=A0set on the new thread. =C2=A0This prevents the thread from inadvert=
ently
> =C2=A0inheriting affinity from a random sibling.

Shouldn't new threads inherit affinity from the threads which spawned them?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAF-QHFXQXqFskmMU%2BYxqmFEVKOoiHGMdnHBkSjqaEVZmjs_ovQ>