From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 17 20:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6283316A422 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:47:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from mh2.centtech.com (moat3.centtech.com [207.200.51.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BB343D60 for ; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:47:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Received: from [10.177.171.220] (neutrino.centtech.com [10.177.171.220]) by mh2.centtech.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k2HKl8QC072730; Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:47:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from anderson@centtech.com) Message-ID: <441B2049.20507@centtech.com> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:47:05 -0600 From: Eric Anderson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eric Anderson References: <4415E8BB.1080602@centtech.com> <6.2.3.4.0.20060313172933.1058dc30@64.7.153.2> <4416C6AA.5050200@centtech.com> <441B1C28.1020808@centtech.com> In-Reply-To: <441B1C28.1020808@centtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1336/Fri Mar 17 12:06:31 2006 on mh2.centtech.com X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc in 6.1-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:47:12 -0000 Eric Anderson wrote: > [moved to -current due to lack of response] > > Eric Anderson wrote: >> Mike Tancsa wrote: >>> At 04:48 PM 13/03/2006, Eric Anderson wrote: >>>> I get the above panic after nfs clients attach to this nfs server >>>> and being >>>> I do have dumps from two crashes so far. >>>> This is FreeBSD-6.1-PRERELEASE from Friday-ish. >>> >>> Dont know if it was fixed or not, but there were a lot of VM changes >>> committed last night that might help. >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/2006-March/023526.html >>> >> >> I just updated, and it still happens. More information for those >> interested: >> >> mode = 0100600, inum = 58456203, fs = /mnt >> panic: ffs_valloc: dup alloc >> >> >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 >> 165 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); >> (kgdb) backtrace >> #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 >> #1 0xc064482f in boot (howto=260) at >> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:399 >> #2 0xc0644b55 in panic (fmt=0xc0890967 "ffs_valloc: dup alloc") at >> /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:555 >> #3 0xc077ee3c in ffs_valloc (pvp=0xc8eab440, mode=33152, >> cred=0xc8a91d80, vpp=0xe83a5824) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:945 >> #4 0xc07a5933 in ufs_makeinode (mode=33152, dvp=0xc8eab440, >> vpp=0xe83a5acc, cnp=0xe83a5ae0) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2165 >> #5 0xc07a2b0d in ufs_create (ap=0x0) at >> /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:171 >> #6 0xc082dc98 in VOP_CREATE_APV (vop=0x0, a=0xe83a5a18) at >> vnode_if.c:204 >> #7 0xc0737590 in nfsrv_create (nfsd=0xc8a91d00, slp=0xc8816700, >> td=0xc7d99780, mrq=0xe83a5c98) at vnode_if.h:111 >> #8 0xc0744e95 in nfssvc_nfsd (td=0x0) at >> /usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:472 >> #9 0xc0744688 in nfssvc (td=0xc7d99780, uap=0xe83a5d04) at >> /usr/src/sys/nfsserver/nfs_syscalls.c:181 >> #10 0xc081cd7f in syscall (frame= >> {tf_fs = 59, tf_es = 59, tf_ds = 59, tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = 0, >> tf_ebp = -1077941448, tf_isp = -398828188, tf_ebx = 4, tf_edx = >> 672385208, tf_ecx = 25, tf_eax = 155, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, >> tf_eip = 671840155, tf_cs = 51, tf_eflags = 662, tf_esp = >> -1077941476, tf_ss = 59}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:981 >> #11 0xc0809e8f in Xint0x80_syscall () at >> /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:200 >> #12 0x00000033 in ?? () >> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) >> (kgdb) >> >> Maybe that helps somebody? >> >> Should I sent this to -current instead, since it appears this would >> happen under -current also, and possibly there is a larger base of >> people watching the list? > > > Also, here's a screenshot of the crash, and I have a good dump if > anyone wants me to get more debugging info. > > http://www.googlebit.com/freebsd/fbsd-6.1b4-nfscrash.png > Oh yea, and I can reproduce at will, on two separate machines. Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric Anderson Sr. Systems Administrator Centaur Technology Anything that works is better than anything that doesn't. ------------------------------------------------------------------------