From owner-freebsd-scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 24 10:38:22 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A6B37B401; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:38:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [207.200.153.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A0B43FA3; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:38:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tom@sdf.com) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 19fiII-0001q9-00; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:46:14 -0700 Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 08:46:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Scott Long In-Reply-To: <3F201027.3080605@freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org cc: Josh Brooks Subject: Re: aaccli: what kind of disk is it ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-scsi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: SCSI subsystem List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 17:38:22 -0000 On Thu, 24 Jul 2003, Scott Long wrote: > Tom Samplonius wrote: > > On Wed, 23 Jul 2003, Josh Brooks wrote: > > > >>I have studied the help/usage for aaccli for quite a while, and I cannot > >>figure out how to do two things: > >> > >>a) how can I determine the actual, real size of the disk ? For instance, > >>I have some 36gig drives that are 36.8 gigs unformatted size, and some > >>that are 36.4, and so on - if I want to buy a replacement drive to, say, > >>rebuild a mirror, I have to get one that is the same size or larger - so > >>how, in aaccli, can I see the actual unformatted size of that disk ? > > > > > > Most RAID devices do rounding: 4, 9, 18, 36, 72, etc. So if the device > > is a fraction bigger, it just rounds its capacity down to the standard > > size. > > Not true. Really? I've never seen one that didn't. Replacing disks is a basic requirement of RAID, so it seems odd that anyone would want to make it hard to do. Do you know the which devices don't do this? > > Besides, if you are doing RAID1 or RAID5, the controller can only > > use as much capacity as the smallest disk in the set. So, if you mirror > > a 9GB and 18GB, you will only get a 9GB set. > > > > The point of the question was that if a failed disk is replaced with one > that is fractionally smaller, it won't work. > > Scott Tom