From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 14 16:13:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D40510656C3; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from tensor.andric.com (cl-327.ede-01.nl.sixxs.net [IPv6:2001:7b8:2ff:146::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B4B28FC13; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:13:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimitry@andric.com) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:51ab:b60f:9684:238d] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:51ab:b60f:9684:238d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 238FF11F838; Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:13:43 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <496E0F36.6090702@andric.com> Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:13:42 +0100 From: Dimitry Andric User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-US; rv:1.9.1b3pre) Gecko/20090108 Shredder/3.0b2pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Talon References: <20090113044111.134EC1CC0B@ptavv.es.net> <20090113222023.GA51810@lor.one-eyed-alien.net> <496D1ED6.4090202@FreeBSD.org> <200901132356.40820.ken@mthelicon.com> <496D64A0.1090309@FreeBSD.org> <20090114091342.GA19986@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20090114091342.GA19986@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Maxim Sobolev , freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Alternatives to gcc (was Re: gcc 4.3: when will it become standard compiler?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:13:45 -0000 On 2009-01-14 10:13, Michel Talon wrote: > Apparently the FreeBSD project doesn't want to include any GPL V3 because > there are industrial partners who have banned the GPl V3, out of purely > ideological position, without any rational basis. I wonder why the FreeBSD > project has any reason to follow them. I think you are going a bit too far, if you say "purely ideological", and "without any rational basis". The GPL V3 *is* different from V2, and anyone may have their own reasons for not agreeing with the diffs, just as with source code patches. :) That said, dependence on GNU gcc has always been bad, and it was always due to show up sometime. So now it does. Hopefully there will be some thought about alternatives.