Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 2 May 2006 18:13:07 -0400
From:      Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To:        Pavel Merdine <freebsd-fs@merdin.com>
Cc:        Peter Holm <freebsd-fs@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Stress testing the UFS2 filesystem
Message-ID:  <20060502221306.GD95348@xor.obsecurity.org>
In-Reply-To: <1541458526.20060503003229@merdin.com>
References:  <20060502193900.GA94069@peter.osted.lan> <1541458526.20060503003229@merdin.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--rz+pwK2yUstbofK6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 12:32:29AM +0400, Pavel Merdine wrote:
> Hello ,
>=20
> Thank you for raising this problem again. I already tried to do that
> in that list, but received an answer that kernel is intended to do
> that. For example, you have a faulty disk. And you have a faulty
> sector which happened to occur on the directory place. So each time
> kernel reads this sector it panics. So it's initially hard to even
> understand what happens. And also it leads to corruption and lost
> files on other file system (each time). Imagine if you have 15 disks.
> In this case you have many files lost just because of a small (and not
> significant) fault. It's just a nonsense.
> Personally, I just replaced bad_dir with error return.
> By the way, there was some bug in fs in kernel that could lead to
> panic even on clean filesystem (bad_dir as far as I remember). It is
> very rare and it was fixed on DragonFly. As far as I remember a fix
> for this was also commited to current recently.
>=20
> I think that Linux is usually much smarter on this. By default it
> remounts a file system as read-only in case it detects a filesystem
> corruption. I would be very happy if FreeBSD could do the same,
> because fs panics really hurt when you have many systems with disks.
>=20
> Of course I think we could do patches to overcome corrupting panics,
> but the core FreeBSD team would not accept this, as they are happy
> with panics and corruptions they make to other filesystems.

Of course not, don't make silly accusations :-)

The problem is much more difficult to solve than "making the panic an
error return".

Kris
--rz+pwK2yUstbofK6
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEV9lyWry0BWjoQKURAmKvAKCUqutakqkiSFOI9cE6smyEhLKg1QCggx0L
sR1ctm8qukBIbheUzHr4Bac=
=Fwc/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--rz+pwK2yUstbofK6--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060502221306.GD95348>