Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 12:51:34 -0700 From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org> To: Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com> Cc: "freebsd-mips@freebsd.org" <freebsd-mips@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Router Station Pro etherswitchcfg problem Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmo=ch%2BGMCGafB1ZEtaUuiYcMH3vQGNNwb5pzYcSq5zfjtA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <CAB=2f8xobAEG%2BfK4YXHMMOo2LZAcT8LakLjeHJ_z-qUevWbsVg@mail.gmail.com> References: <20140313215332.7824a6e5@zeta.dino.sk> <CAB=2f8xfRVnsLK2hJotkKuG2bTnSfUAVOzDvH_OycOQFi8uTQA@mail.gmail.com> <20140314143905.081f073d@zeta.dino.sk> <CAB=2f8xobAEG%2BfK4YXHMMOo2LZAcT8LakLjeHJ_z-qUevWbsVg@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, It's per port because that's how it's logically supposed to be. Ie, there's a set of VLANs in the switch. Then you have a native VLAN on a port, which is the untagged VLAN. Then you allow other VLANs to show up on the port, which are the tagged VLANs that show up on said port. -a On 14 March 2014 12:42, Luiz Otavio O Souza <lists.br@gmail.com> wrote: > On 14 March 2014 10:39, Milan Obus wrote: >> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 09:28:37 -0300 >> Luiz Otavio O Souza wrote: >> >>> Hey Milan, >>> >>> I'll look into this. Just give me a couple of days so i can recycle my >>> RSPRO setup. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Luiz >>> >> >> I found a workaround (kind of), see below. >> >> >> [ snip ] >> >> With command 'etherswitchcfg port0 addtag pvid 1', config for port 0 >> becomes >> >> port0: >> pvid: 1 >> flags=5<CPUPORT,ADDTAG> >> media: Ethernet 1000baseT <full-duplex> >> status: active >> >> and _all_ frames sent to CPU have dot1q header. This way I can create >> up to 16 vlan groups on etherswitch (and correspondign arge1.n >> subinterfaces) to achieve what I usually want, just one thing seems not >> to be possible this way - hybrid port with both native (untagged) and >> tagged traffic. >> >> In any case, it would be good to have this better documented. I don't >> know if we have any place for this. man page is good, but not >> everything did work for me. >> >> Milan > > Yes Milan, that is correct i remember now. > > You have to enable the tagging on the CPU port to receive the tagged packets. > > What i don't remember is why this switch was coded with the tag/untag > feature per port and not per vlan, but i guess that was because i > don't have the docs for it. > > While you can't have the hybrid setup, the trunk setup works fine with FreeBSD. > > And, yes, we need to get a better man page. If you have suggestions > you can send it as text diffs to me, otherwise i'll try to get more > working examples when i have some quality time with my RSPRO/RB450G > again. > > Thanks, > Luiz > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-mips@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-mips > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-mips-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJ-Vmo=ch%2BGMCGafB1ZEtaUuiYcMH3vQGNNwb5pzYcSq5zfjtA>