From owner-freebsd-chat  Sat Jan  4 06:49:19 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id GAA26466
          for chat-outgoing; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 06:49:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from revelstone.jvm.com (revelstone.jvm.com [207.98.213.2])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id GAA26461
          for <chat@freebsd.org>; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 06:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freyes.dh.i-2000.com (slip166-72-219-95.ny.us.ibm.net [166.72.219.95]) by revelstone.jvm.com (8.7.5/8.6.12) with SMTP id JAA09429; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 09:49:11 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199701041449.JAA09429@revelstone.jvm.com>
From: "Francisco Reyes" <francisco@natserv.com>
To: "FreeBSd Chat list" <chat@freebsd.org>,
        "Joerg Wunsch" <joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de>
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 97 09:48:42 -0400
Reply-To: "Francisco Reyes" <francisco@natserv.com>
Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Francisco Reyes's Registered PMMail 1.53 For OS/2
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: FreeBSD into larget corp. environment?
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Sat, 4 Jan 1997 11:50:27 +0100, J Wunsch wrote:

>As Francisco Reyes wrote:
>Well, that would be a fairly dreaded task then.  Remember, most of us
>are here for fun, and `fun' spells for many of us like `coding'.  So
>while we are certainly all willing to take our share, and get new
>volunteers flying (i remember that i've helped a few people to find a
>start in the project

I think that there may be someone who wouldn't dread the task. For
instance I had a co-worker that even though his job was as programmer,
he loved interacting with people more than anything else. There are all
kind of people involved with FreeBSD. 


>> Make it easier to submit documentation.
>
>Hmm, i don't have an idea about the current size of activities of the
>`docs' folks.  I always refer interested parties to their mailing
>list.

I tried once to help with documentation and found it frustrating. If
they could just give a bit more guidance on how to do SGML that would
be a great starting point. I tried looking at the existing code and
didn't get too far.