From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Aug 14 09:23:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA18729 for freebsd-hackers-outgoing; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 09:23:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from bright.fx.genx.net (bright.fx.genx.net [206.64.4.154]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA18722 for ; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 09:23:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) Received: from localhost (bright@localhost) by bright.fx.genx.net (8.9.1/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA02113; Fri, 14 Aug 1998 12:23:35 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from bright@hotjobs.com) X-Authentication-Warning: bright.fx.genx.net: bright owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 14 Aug 1998 12:23:35 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein X-Sender: bright@bright.fx.genx.net To: poipoi@famipow.com cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: solaris smp management In-Reply-To: <19980814063439.175.qmail@hwi.poi.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG it isn't an "algorithm" rather a total restructuring of the kernel. freebsd wouldn't be "BSD" anymore if it adopted the same path as sun. that's why there is no more "sunos" just solaris, sunos was a BSD kernel, while solaris was a resturctured blend of BSD and SRV4. -Alfred -- Programmer @ HotJobs Inc. [- http://www.hotjobs.com/ -] |-- There are operating systems, and then there's BSD. \-- http://www.freebsd.org/ On Fri, 14 Aug 1998 poipoi@famipow.com wrote: > hi > > a lot of people on this list seems agree to say "solaris smp > is faster freebsd or linux one". Can you explain why it is faster ? and > why freebsd and linux dont use the same algorithm ? > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message