From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Aug 12 19:53:12 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1840E16A4DD
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:53:12 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E2D43D45
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:53:11 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2])
	by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C50170DE;
	Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:53:07 +0000 (UTC)
To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 12 Aug 2006 12:43:27 MST."
	<44DE2F5F.2010207@elischer.org> 
Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:53:07 +0000
Message-ID: <3892.1155412387@critter.freebsd.dk>
Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: suggested addition to 'date' 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Aug 2006 19:53:12 -0000

In message <44DE2F5F.2010207@elischer.org>, Julian Elischer writes:
>Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:

>
>You might say that the "logger" program would be overly bloated by 
>having to include the whole of 'date'.

Why would you need to include "the whole of 'date'" ?  Have you
never heard of strftime(3) ?

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.