From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 24 19:36:44 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: emulation@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA2C16A468 for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (vlk.vlakno.cz [62.168.28.247]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946E513C4BE for ; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E9318BE8B5; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:36:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vlk.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EEpSYO5YpTbu; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:36:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2956F8BE61C; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:36:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id l5OJadi0085141; Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:36:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 21:36:39 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20070624193639.GA85082@freebsd.org> References: <20070623180527.46d8b270@deskjail> <20070624081005.GA70874@freebsd.org> <20070624104805.065e2918@deskjail> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20070624104805.065e2918@deskjail> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Testers for linuxulator MFC needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2007 19:36:44 -0000 On Sun, Jun 24, 2007 at 10:48:05AM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > Quoting Roman Divacky (Sun, 24 Jun 2007 10:10:05 +0200): > > > do you plan to remove COMPAT_43 from GENERIC? also.. I think we extended rlimit as well > > For the public (after private discussion): I think removing COMPAT_43 > is a too large change for -stable and the rlimit stuff seemsto be MFCed > already. otoh I think that removing COMPAT_43 is a nice thing so I'd advocate a compromise: instead options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] just options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 because no significat subsystem is dependant on that and it brings some performance benefits for people (note that MOST of the people keep the options only because of the KEEP THIS! commet) just my 2 cents roman