From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jul 19 12:03:16 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA4E37B401 for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:03:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com (ms-smtp-02.southeast.rr.com [24.93.67.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F3B43FAF for ; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 12:03:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])h6JJ05qP015014; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:00:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) h6JJ37iZ003631; Sat, 19 Jul 2003 15:03:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Bob Perry In-Reply-To: <3F198D91.4050801@earthlink.net> References: <3F198D91.4050801@earthlink.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-z5A80QMzegjbdHwHibJM" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1058641390.3465.3.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.3 Date: 19 Jul 2003 15:03:10 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-10.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_10,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2, QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES, USER_AGENT_XIMIAN autolearn=ham version=2.55 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp) cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrade GNOME 1.4 to 2.2 on FreeBSD 4.7-RELEASE X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2003 19:03:16 -0000 --=-z5A80QMzegjbdHwHibJM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, 2003-07-19 at 14:27, Bob Perry wrote: > Hi, > Just cvsup'd the latest ports tree and found 15 ports "orphaned". Later=20 > found that GNOME 1.4 was no longer supported and it was recommended that=20 > GNOME 2.2 be installed. I read the FAQ document and in section # 4, it=20 > indicates that 16 GNOME 1.4 pkgs needed to be removed before attempting=20 > the upgrade. >=20 > * Can I assume that it is not necessary to remove a pkg if it has > been orphaned? No, you should still remove the old ports. > * Three of the ports mentioned in the section, libgtop, gedit, and > eog, are questionable. >=20 > * Libgtop is still shown as "up-to-date with port". Should I > still remove libgtop or is there a late change with regard to > its' existance? Yes. libgtop conflicts with libgtop2. libgtop is scheduled for removal in phase II of the GNOME 1.4 purge. > * gedit and eog simply don't appear at all in the port tree.=20 > Can I disregard them? If you have them installed, you need to remove them. There are newer versions that are part of the GNOME 2 desktop. >=20 > * Are WITH_FAM and WITH_LAME necessary when upgrading? No, but they make the final desktop a bit nicer. Joe >=20 > Any updates? >=20 > Thanks, >=20 > Bob >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-gnome > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-gnome-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-z5A80QMzegjbdHwHibJM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/GZXub2iPiv4Uz4cRAkulAJ9W2bVzRndmrIxaeYFFYdlIEYUOBwCdETRq rVP35+sog76yoCVww4vdROA= =3lVl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-z5A80QMzegjbdHwHibJM--