From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 19 21:42:03 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E20106564A for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@xerq.net) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [67.52.126.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829728FC12 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cartman.xerq.net (unknown [127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D41C40B12 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from cartman.xerq.net ([127.52.126.46]) by cartman.xerq.net (cartman.xerq.net [127.52.126.46]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vXatCleOUX1C for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from www1.xerq.net (localhost [127.52.126.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by cartman.xerq.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0567D40AF7 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 13:22:51 -0800 From: Matt Connor To: In-Reply-To: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> References: <7840786B-5C23-4C6D-AEE5-3DC23E96FC82@kfu.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: bsd@xerq.net User-Agent: XERQ Webmail/0.7.1 Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE success X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 21:42:03 -0000 On 19.01.2012 13:15, Nick Sayer wrote: > I have a VPS at rootbsd.net, and have been running 8.2-RELEASE with a > XENHVM kernel with a patch to fix the 'do something smart' panic in > if_xn. I fetched the 9.0-RELEASE source tree and built a kernel to > try > and it worked without any muss or fuss. I did the rest of the upgrade > and it's working just fine, so far as I can tell. > > And there was much > rejoicing._______________________________________________ Same here at ssdnodes.com - we pulled the new source tree, rebuilt with our modified XENHVM and haven't had any issues so far. We had many tweaks in /etc/sysctl.conf to improve throughput for the 8.2-RELEASE, the 9.0-RELEASE systems still remained snappy after the tweaks were removed. -Matt