From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 20 08:16:59 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E61B11065672 for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:16:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dennylin93@hs.ntnu.edu.tw) Received: from mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw [140.131.149.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BAF8FC0A for ; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:16:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0E30E1C6443; Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:16:52 +0800 (CST) Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 16:16:52 +0800 From: Denny Lin To: Dominic Fandrey Message-ID: <20120820081651.GI57907@mail.hs.ntnu.edu.tw> References: <50170F2E.2060804@bsdforen.de> <50276571.5070709@bsdforen.de> <5031EC66.8020807@bsdforen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5031EC66.8020807@bsdforen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [CFT] TexLive port X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Aug 2012 08:17:00 -0000 On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 09:51:02AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > On 12/08/2012 10:12, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >On 31/07/2012 00:48, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > >>I have a well working TexLive 2012 port, intended to be a replacement > >>for teTex. > >> > >>... > >> > >>Because a lot of things depend on a working TeX install I'd like to > >>have some volunteers in a week. > > > >Here we go: > >http://www.home.hs-karlsruhe.de/~fado1011/texlive/ > > I'm about ready now. I just need to complete the CONFLICTS. Clearly > just anything with teTeX in the name isn't enough. I think I need > help figuring this out. > > Or at least a recommendation. Should I go ahead with a PR and just > add ports as people report problems? Sorry, I must have missed this part in my previous email. The CONFLICTS you have should cover everything. I'm just speculating that the transition would have been smoother if the teTeX ports were deleted in one go before replacing them with portmaster. -- Denny Lin