From owner-svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Thu Mar 12 07:05:04 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-branches@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F924276C60; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48dKb40Pbgz4GPR; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:05:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id CA2721CCB8; Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:03:48 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:03:48 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Jochen Neumeister Cc: Jung-uk Kim , ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r528268 - in branches/2020Q1/www: flashplayer linux-flashplayer Message-ID: <20200312070348.GA52752@FreeBSD.org> References: <202003120306.02C36SSk038133@repo.freebsd.org> <491d1e11-5772-7bd1-3c00-8d97723b1ffa@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <491d1e11-5772-7bd1-3c00-8d97723b1ffa@FreeBSD.org> X-BeenThere: svn-ports-branches@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the branches of the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2020 07:05:04 -0000 On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 07:20:49AM +0100, Jochen Neumeister wrote: > Am 12.03.20 um 04:06 schrieb Jung-uk Kim: > > New Revision: 528268 > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/528268 > > > > Log: > > MFH: r528267 > > Update to 32.0.0.344. > > Approved by: ports-secteam (blanket) > > What exactly is the reason for MFH, and why then (blanket)? > I can't tell from the commit log. It's probably safe to assume that whenever version bumps in this piece of sh^Wsoftware it's due to another dozen of secutity bugs discovered. ./danfe