From owner-freebsd-current Fri May 8 19:59:24 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA11691 for freebsd-current-outgoing; Fri, 8 May 1998 19:59:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mailer.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp (ns.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp [210.161.209.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA11686 for ; Fri, 8 May 1998 19:59:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp) Received: from localhost (ns1.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp [210.161.209.138]) by mailer.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp (8.8.8/3.6W) with ESMTP id LAA20953 for ; Sat, 9 May 1998 11:56:59 +0900 (JST) To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Soft update code looking very stable In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 8 May 1998 18:44:20 -0400 (EDT)" References: X-Mailer: Mew version 1.93b1 on XEmacs 20.3 (Vatican City) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19980509115659K.ken@ns1.tydfam.machida.tokyo.jp> Date: Sat, 09 May 1998 11:56:59 +0900 From: Takeshi Yamada X-Dispatcher: imput version 971024 Lines: 8 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I experienced the same problem without any j options - lock up and no response during "make buildworld". (Mine is May 8th -current source with 2 source codes from ~julian. P6@200Mhz 128MBDRAM, ASUSP6NP5 MB) I thought that -j option might solve the problem first, but it did not. And I feel that it is nothing to do with -j option. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message