From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jun 23 17:34:13 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3098B333D92 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) Received: from mx1.enfer-du-nord.net (mx1.enfer-du-nord.net [91.121.41.56]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49rtgS1p3Cz3bp1 for ; Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from trashcan@ellael.org) From: Michael Grimm X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.3 at mail.enfer-du-nord.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: WITH_META_MODE and poudriere: *.meta files, where? Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 19:34:09 +0200 References: <738C0F2E-5360-47C7-80B3-3F17FE72E7D9@ellael.org> <37E9D0C7-A208-4C4C-BB61-1E359E31B193@ellael.org> <7f084b51-46fc-3adb-2f13-2ca87990ef1e@infracaninophile.co.uk> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <7f084b51-46fc-3adb-2f13-2ca87990ef1e@infracaninophile.co.uk> Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 49rtgS1p3Cz3bp1 X-Spamd-Bar: ++++ Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of trashcan@ellael.org has no SPF policy when checking 91.121.41.56) smtp.mailfrom=trashcan@ellael.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [4.42 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MV_CASE(0.50)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[ellael.org]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.70)[0.704]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.33)[0.326]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.99)[0.988]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:16276, ipnet:91.121.0.0/16, country:FR]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.33 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2020 17:34:13 -0000 matthew@freebsd.org wrote: > On 23/06/2020 12:08, Michael Grimm wrote: >> Hmm, but that information doesn't help me regarding my question = above: >> Where does poudriere store .meta files during compilations? >> META_MODE doesn't make sense, IMHO, if this information isn't stored = somewhere before being reused in subsequent compilations of a given = port. Or am I mistaken? >=20 > META_MODE is a feature of building FreeBSD itself, not for building = ports. So, unless you're using the rather bleeding edge poudriere(1) = work to be able to build base system packages, poudriere is simply not = going to be dealing with .meta files. Thanks, that's what I have "feared": I misunderstood the scope of = bdrewery's commit regarding /etc/src-env.conf > What you can do for poudriere is enable CCACHE -- as described in the = referenced article. This makes quite a bit of difference to recompiling = some of the bigger ports like LLVM, but will have very little effect on = the majority of ports that only take a matter of a few seconds to = compile. Even so, it's well worth doing overall. My first reaction after anticipating increase in compilation times has = been: activating CCACHE ;-)=20 And thanks again, you clarified yet another "fear" of mine, namely, that = it will only speed-up larger ports. Thanks to all, Michael