From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 4 16:35:06 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCE0D16A4CE for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4751343D58 for ; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 16:35:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olafvdspek@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so1477418wri for ; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:35:05 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=b8vy8PJrwpvp/MqZR9z7hAyPTTApuhJv3JN1SDDvITTq9GvE7EhlX8SkhkkBxieBEIQnj/nFugvf3oDAlGba6CULaPORQ/rJ/pSiy0WHLZmEaI8IG6AEXz+VR5atcpjvxWjwMTxQxRBMTSRariS/FnAhvruXjejHkR3u4CWw/j4= Received: by 10.54.42.72 with SMTP id p72mr420959wrp; Mon, 04 Apr 2005 09:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.54.49.66 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Apr 2005 09:35:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 18:35:02 +0200 From: Olaf van der Spek To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <48a5f32a05040405393061ec68@mail.gmail.com> <42514210.2010509@mail.ru><425167A6.1070700@mail.ru> Subject: Re: Will Sempron 754 run with FreeBSD i386? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Olaf van der Spek List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2005 16:35:06 -0000 On Apr 4, 2005 6:13 PM, Andrew P. wrote: > > Are you sure? > > The s754 versions have an on die memory controller and a K8 core > > (although with disabled 64-bit mode), which should make it > > significantly faster then the K7 based Sempron on sA. > > Yeah, it appears I got a wrong idea from some poor > article. As a matter of fact, Sempron/sA is based > on Barton core, while Sempron/s754 is a K8 sister. > The latter has an on-chip memory controller and > SSE2 instruction set supported. They are pretty > same in all other aspects though, and I still > suppose the perfomance margin is negligible. Why do you expect so much performance to be lost compared to the Athlon 64 s754? The Athlon 64 s754 is significantly faster than the Athlon XP.