From owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Dec  8 20:28:52 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59FC16A4CE
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 20:28:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from publicd.ub.mng.net (publicd.ub.mng.net [202.179.0.88])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C5943D2C
	for <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>; Mon,  8 Dec 2003 20:28:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from ganbold@micom.mng.net)
Received: from [202.179.0.164] (helo=ganbold.micom.mng.net)
	by publicd.ub.mng.net with asmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD 5.1)
	id 1ATZR9-000GeW-3p; Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:25:27 +0800
Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031209122902.02a58840@202.179.0.80>
X-Sender: ganbold@micom.mng.net@202.179.0.80
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 12:32:07 +0800
To: Don Bowman <don@sandvine.com>
From: Ganbold <ganbold@micom.mng.net>
In-Reply-To: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337035E404F@mail.sandvine.com
 >
References: <FE045D4D9F7AED4CBFF1B3B813C85337035E404F@mail.sandvine.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: bridged ipfw problem in FreeBSD 5.2beta
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: IPFW Technical Discussions <freebsd-ipfw.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ipfw>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ipfw>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ipfw-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Dec 2003 04:28:53 -0000

Hi,

Thank you for all who helped me. It seems that arp packets weren't pass 
through firewall.
I added the rule as don suggested and since then it is working well for 
last 25 hours.

Ganbold


At 10:26 PM 05.12.2003, you wrote:
>From: Ganbold [mailto:ganbold@micom.mng.net]
>
>  ... bridging firewall ...
>
> ># Allowing connections through localhost.
> >${fwcmd} add 300 pass all from any to any via lo0
> ># pass ARP
> >${fwcmd} add 301 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 2054 to 0.0.0.0
>
>the comment at least is not right, arp is not udp.
>
>maybe something like "add 301 allow layer2 mac-type arp"
>instead?
>
>--don