From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jul 26 13:15:14 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.thewrittenword.com (pipe.thewrittenword.com [216.80.59.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF1337BE1D for ; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 13:15:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd-net@thewrittenword.com) Received: (from root@localhost) by postal.thewrittenword.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA23294 for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Jul 2000 08:02:12 -0500 (CDT) From: freebsd-net@thewrittenword.com Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2000 01:36:52 -0500 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Routing help Message-ID: <20000726013652.B8690@postal.thewrittenword.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.1.12i Status: RO Lines: 16 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I have a FreeBSD/x86 3.4 box configured with two NICs, both connected to separate networks. I have one default route. How would I do the following: 1. Respond to all packets coming from NIC #1 through NIC #1 and respond to all packages coming from NIC #2 through NIC #2. Because I have a default route, all packages return through only one NIC. 2. If NIC #1 goes down and the default route is set to NIC #1, no packets can go through on NIC #2 (only for that subnet). Is it possible to add a second default route so when the network on NIC #1 goes down packets are sent through NIC #2 (this disturbs connections already on NIC #1 but that's OK). -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message