From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Oct 26 7:49:43 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from probity.mcc.ac.uk (probity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E16814BD3 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 07:49:40 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by probity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #3) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org id 11g7uu-0008Eg-00; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:49:40 +0100 Received: from localhost (jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA81258 for ; Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:49:39 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Date: Tue, 26 Oct 1999 15:49:39 +0100 (BST) From: J McKitrick To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Is the FBSD kernel multi-threaded? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I think Solaris is, and it seems this would be a great advantage. If not, how do we avoid system call bottlenecks? -jm To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message