From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 29 10:32:12 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B90DD16A4CE; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:32:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from lakemtao05.cox.net (lakemtao05.cox.net [68.1.17.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164DB43D31; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 10:32:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mezz7@cox.net) Received: from mezz.mezzweb.com ([68.103.32.11]) by lakemtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20031229183210.MUSY29834.lakemtao05.cox.net@mezz.mezzweb.com>; Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:32:10 -0500 Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:31:09 -0600 To: Joe Marcus Clarke References: <1072720635.762.17.camel@gyros> <1072722106.762.20.camel@gyros> From: Jeremy Messenger Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset=iso-8859-1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1072722106.762.20.camel@gyros> User-Agent: Opera7.23/Linux M2 build 518 cc: FreeBSD GNOME Users Subject: Re: HEADS UP 2.5 TESTERS: New FreeBSD GNOME Devel FAQ X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2003 18:32:12 -0000 On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 13:21:46 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > On Mon, 2003-12-29 at 13:14, Jeremy Messenger wrote: >> On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:57:15 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke >> >> wrote: >> >> > Adam and I have cranked out an FAQ on tracking the GNOME Development >> > branches. Here we're including common questions and known issues. If >> > you're testing 2.5, you should definitely check it out. If you have >> > items to add to the known issues section, please let us know. Thanks. >> > >> > http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/docs/develfaq.html >> >> Looks good! I think, add FAQ of upgrade from 2.4.x to 2.5.x and/or new >> update of glib, gtk and pango 2.5.x is good idea. I usually do the >> 'portupgrade -rf glib-2\*' and it works very well in my case so far. How >> about someone has the different way? > > I plan on writing a script for the 2.4 -> 2.6 upgrade. There are some > gotchas that "portupgrade -rf glib-2\*" doesn't handle (e.g. libxml2, > scrollkeeper, etc., plus updating gnomevfs2 again after updating > libgnome). Very nice, thanks for your work to plan on write a script of upgrade. I think, Gnome team do really need to start to think of make the things easier to upgrade in future. Gnome isn't easy to upgrade compare to the other DEs. Cheers, Mezz > Joe > >> >> > Joe -- bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.