From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 19 08:07:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B8537B401; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:07:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from demos.su (mx.demos.su [194.87.0.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76F3343F75; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 08:07:15 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mitya@fling-wing.demos.su) Received: from [194.87.5.69] (HELO fling-wing.demos.su) by demos.su (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b7/D) with ESMTP-TLS id 76635532; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:07:14 +0400 Received: from fling-wing.demos.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fling-wing.demos.su (8.12.9/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h5JF7D5R056639; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:07:13 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from mitya@fling-wing.demos.su) Received: (from mitya@localhost) by fling-wing.demos.su (8.12.9/8.12.6/Submit) id h5JF7Bih056638; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:07:11 +0400 (MSD) Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 19:07:11 +0400 From: Dmitry Sivachenko To: Mike Silbersack Message-ID: <20030619150711.GA56423@fling-wing.demos.su> References: <200306181857.h5IIvwfY075070@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030619082713.GC79448@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030619115532.A629@odysseus.silby.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030619115532.A629@odysseus.silby.com> WWW-Home-Page: http://mitya.pp.ru/ X-PGP-Key: http://mitya.pp.ru/mitya.asc User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: David Schultz cc: Mike Silbersack cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern kern_descrip.c X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 15:07:18 -0000 On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 12:02:09PM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > Oh, btw; while running my fd hog program as root, cron decided to core. > Someone should take a look at it and figure out where it doesn't check the > return value of something which allocates a fd (or socket?) > bin/49096 ?