From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 22 09:15:53 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 872F437B401; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id A535E43FBD; Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:15:51 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au)
Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246])
	by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA26663;
	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:15:49 +1000
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2003 02:15:48 +1000 (EST)
From: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org
To: David Schultz <das@freebsd.org>
In-Reply-To: <20030422125608.GB8074@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
Message-ID: <20030423021331.W17870@gamplex.bde.org>
References: <20030420192319.GB4963@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
	<Pine.NEB.3.96L.1030420174551.16891t-100000@fledge.watson.org>
	<20030421231756.H11214@gamplex.bde.org>
	<20030422210632.U16843@gamplex.bde.org>
	<20030422125608.GB8074@HAL9000.homeunix.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: HEADS UP: UFS2 now the default creation type on 5.0-CURRENT
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2003 16:15:53 -0000

On Tue, 22 Apr 2003, David Schultz wrote:

> On Tue, Apr 22, 2003, Bruce Evans wrote:
> > I tried this, but it had no effect since FS_TO_VBA() is never actually used.
> > So there is a much better optimization for it :-).  I think this makes ma()
> > unused too.
>
> In that case, I'm wondering how I managed to save a few bytes by
> adding ma().  (Isn't the other macro that uses it expanded twice?)

I deleted too much context, so couldn't remeber if ma() was used twice,
then guessed wrong.

Bruce