From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May  9 11:29:37 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 89C3337B401; Fri,  9 May 2003 11:29:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (beastie.mckusick.com [209.31.233.184])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D898D43F93; Fri,  9 May 2003 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Received: from beastie.mckusick.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by beastie.mckusick.com (8.12.8/8.12.3) with ESMTP id h49ITXTh028743;
	Fri, 9 May 2003 11:29:34 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com)
Message-Id: <200305091829.h49ITXTh028743@beastie.mckusick.com>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 09 May 2003 17:23:41 +1000."
             <20030509162725.N80145@gamplex.bde.org> 
Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 11:29:33 -0700
From: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@beastie.mckusick.com>
cc: arch@FreeBSD.org
cc: Brian Buhrow <buhrow@lothlorien.nfbcal.org>
cc: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: Access times on executables (kern/25777) 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture
	<freebsd-arch.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-arch@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-arch>,
	<mailto:freebsd-arch-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 18:29:37 -0000

Well, -async or -noasync, it looks like method 1 is the winning strategy.

	Kirk McKusick