From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jun 12 19:50:19 1995 Return-Path: current-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA11844 for current-outgoing; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:50:19 -0700 Received: from haven.uniserve.com (haven.uniserve.com [198.53.215.121]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA11730 for ; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:50:00 -0700 Received: by haven.uniserve.com id <30732>; Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:50:57 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Jun 1995 19:50:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Tom Samplonius To: Atsushi Murai cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: GENERIC kernel & some basic UNIX pointers In-Reply-To: <9506130247.AA00039@tama3.spec.co.jp.spec.co.jp> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Tue, 13 Jun 1995, Atsushi Murai wrote: > But Predictor-1 will try compression whole date when talk to peer ppp. > This will give us two advantage as follows: > > 1. Decrese system over head due to reducing a sio H/W interruption. > (H/W interruption is required big cpu time especially latest cpu) What about the extra CPU time and extra latency required for the actual compression? > 2. For ISDN TA that doen's has a own H/W compression can get double > speed with not compression data. ( i.e. 38400bps -> 7KB/sec ) I've looked at this application myself. Especially over 56k or 64k links. However, dedicated units still provide better performance (ex. Gandalf 5250i with "advertised" compression up to 8:1, and in reality isn't as much, but is still very good). Tom