Date: Sat, 16 Mar 2024 20:16:21 +0700 From: Eugene Grosbein <eugen@grosbein.net> To: Daniel Engberg <daniel.engberg.lists@pyret.net> Cc: Florian Smeets <flo@FreeBSD.org>, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposed ports deprecation and removal policy Message-ID: <46bc57fc-90af-004e-b722-114869097408@grosbein.net> In-Reply-To: <49c4e69ffb5cec7b71d4b8e01f628ae7@mail.infomaniak.com> References: <435edf7c-a956-4317-b327-3372de70dbef@FreeBSD.org> <1c5b7818-842f-f7b8-9d4e-5bf681cad20e@grosbein.net> <c5e3e5d2d058d90777828b88a0f1506e@mail.infomaniak.com> <64c7435c-2d69-1f62-ba7c-30812860a457@grosbein.net> <9646fd5d0666c8e57795ea1b370b6af1@mail.infomaniak.com> <b10cc27c-d2f9-5c81-115b-2f577ff6f825@grosbein.net> <7a7501f71442d27f6d8c1c0a16f247c1@mail.infomaniak.com> <8212dd5a-bcc2-e214-0373-6dbfddef65c2@grosbein.net> <49c4e69ffb5cec7b71d4b8e01f628ae7@mail.infomaniak.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
16.03.2024 17:03, Daniel Engberg wrote: > A key difference is though that browsers such as Firefox or Chromium are maintained upstream including reporting etc. It does not stop browsers from being vulnerable all the time. All times. So, no difference in practical point of view. In theory, there is difference. Not in practice. Eugen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46bc57fc-90af-004e-b722-114869097408>