Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2020 22:34:18 +0100 From: Mateusz Piotrowski <0mp@FreeBSD.org> To: Marcin Cieslak <saper@saper.info> Cc: Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Timidity++ needs libarc as run dependency ?? Message-ID: <aeab1b48-9df3-7e4f-07da-328aaf159fa5@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <nycvar.OFS.7.76.44444.807.2002271453580.61731@z.fncre.vasb> References: <2f68ffd8-d1f5-7c29-2703-2327187c1069@selasky.org> <e4e8eef2-367a-da6e-0b1f-b1e41719731b@FreeBSD.org> <30953625-3a12-4514-6309-62fc91dea780@selasky.org> <36a4f390-c89a-d7dc-cdc2-3dcca16d73c1@FreeBSD.org> <nycvar.OFS.7.76.44444.807.2002271453580.61731@z.fncre.vasb>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/27/20 3:54 PM, Marcin Cieslak wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>> On 2/26/20 3:20 PM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>> On 2020-02-26 13:18, Mateusz Piotrowski wrote:
>>>> On 2/26/20 10:55 AM, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
>>>>> ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libarc.so.1" not found, required by
>>>>> "timidity"
>>>>>
>>>>> pkg install libarc
>>>>
>>>> It looks like libarc is already included in LIB_DEPENDS. It is not
>>>> included in the timidity++ package. It is only included with the
>>>> timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages (like timidity++-emacs).
>>>>
>>>> I've never used timidity myself, so I am not sure why this is this
>>>> way.
>>>>
>>>> Is there a reason why you installed timidity++ instead of one of
>>>> the timidity++-${PKGNAMESUFFIX} packages?
>>>>
>>>
>>> No specific reason. I just wanted to test some MIDI files.
>>>
>>> And did "pkg instal xxx". Is timidity++ not a valid port/package?
>>
>> It is a valid port. I am not sure why libarc is not a run-time
>> dependency here. Maybe just an oversight.
>
> Maybe there is some bug with
>
> .if !defined(PKGNAMESUFFIX)
>
> during package building?
No idea...
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?aeab1b48-9df3-7e4f-07da-328aaf159fa5>