From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 4 14:55:10 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358AF16A4CE for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:55:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (f170.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7378743D3F for ; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:55:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j24Eshsb017469; Fri, 4 Mar 2005 15:54:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Jari Ruusu From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 04 Mar 2005 16:51:28 +0200." <422875F0.49877364@users.sourceforge.net> Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 15:54:43 +0100 Message-ID: <17468.1109948083@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk cc: ALeine cc: elric@imrryr.org cc: Todd Vierling cc: hackers@freebsd.org cc: tech-security@NetBSD.org cc: "Perry E. Metzger" cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: FUD about CGD and GBDE X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Mar 2005 14:55:10 -0000 In message <422875F0.49877364@users.sourceforge.net>, Jari Ruusu writes: >Early versions of loop-AES were FUBARed, true. But why do you insist on >ranting about fuckups that were fixed long time ago? I don't :-) The topic at hand was why I made certain choices for GBDE the way I did, what loop-AES did subsequent to that time is not really relevant. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.