From owner-freebsd-acpi@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 15 11:15:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2410616A47B for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:15:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw [140.112.90.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9182C43CB2 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: from svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBFBF7Nl046632; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:07 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw) Received: (from rafan@localhost) by svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBFBF7RB099225; Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:07 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from rafan) Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 19:15:07 +0800 From: Rong-En Fan To: takawata@jp.freebsd.org Message-ID: <20061215111507.GA27024@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> References: <20061215103747.GA35194@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw> <200612151100.kBFB0NAS015046@sana.init-main.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200612151100.kBFB0NAS015046@sana.init-main.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) Cc: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: acpi extra driver X-BeenThere: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: ACPI and power management development List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 11:15:10 -0000 On Fri, Dec 15, 2006 at 08:00:23PM +0900, takawata@jp.freebsd.org wrote: > In message <20061215103747.GA35194@svm.csie.ntu.edu.tw>, Rong-En Fan wrote: > >It seems that all acpi_support/acpi_* drivers are listed in > >machine-independent file, i.e. conf/files. But they are only > >appear in i386's NOTES. Well, I know that all these driver=20 > >only appear on i386 before. But now we have some laptop with > >x86-64 cpus, like ThinkPad X60. Shall we list these drivers in > >amd64/NOTES, too? > > I think it's OK. And we may want to hook acpi extras kernel module for > AMD64 or IA64. > How about this patch? Looks good to me. The patch for NOTES is at http://people.freebsd.org/~rafan/acpi_extra_NOTES.diff Regards, Rong-En Fan