From owner-freebsd-hackers  Wed Nov  6 23:16:42 1996
Return-Path: owner-hackers
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id XAA07212
          for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id XAA07204
          for <hackers@freebsd.org>; Wed, 6 Nov 1996 23:16:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199611070716.XAA07204@freefall.freebsd.org>
Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au
	(1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA059471004; Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:16:44 +1100
From: Darren Reed <avalon@coombs.anu.edu.au>
Subject: Re: still no response
To: julian@whistle.com (Julian Elischer)
Date: Thu, 7 Nov 1996 18:16:44 +1100 (EDT)
Cc: hackers@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <328138CB.41C67EA6@whistle.com> from "Julian Elischer" at Nov 6, 96 05:18:03 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

In some mail from Julian Elischer, sie said:
> 
> I still haven't heard back from anyone regarding the
> session limit addition in inetd.
> 
> does everyone think it's a boring idea?
> doesn no one dislikr it?
> should I just check it in?

xinetd ?